Introduction

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems continue to revolutionize industries, they also introduce a new frontier of security challenges. From large language models (LLMs) like GPT to machine learning (ML) models powering autonomous systems, AI is becoming the backbone of modern technology. However, this comes with a significant risk, as AI is now a new attack surface that needs to be properly protected.

AI-driven systems, particularly those involving generative AI (GenAI) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) applications, are vulnerable to various adversarial attacks. These attacks can compromise the integrity of AI models, including LLMs, natural language processing (NLP) systems, and image recognition technologies. For instance, an image recognition system can be manipulated to confuse a stop sign with a green light, while LLMs may fall prey to prompt injections and jailbreaks, potentially causing unintended and harmful outputs.

To address these challenges, several AI security frameworks have been developed. These frameworks, such as NIST's AI Risk Management Framework, ISO/IEC 23894:2023, and the EU AI Act, aim to set standards for mitigating AI-related risks. Complementary to these, AI-specific tools like AI firewalls, vulnerability scanners for AI models, and red-teaming exercises are critical components in defending against adversarial threats. Let's explore these frameworks and their significance in AI security.

AI Security Frameworks

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) 

The NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF), released in 2023, is a comprehensive guide to help organizations manage AI risks in a systematic and measurable way. NIST's framework emphasizes four core functions: Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage.

‍

• Govern: Establish organizational policies to address AI risks.
• Map: Identify potential AI risks in system development.
• Measure: Assess and monitor AI-related risks.
• Manage: Implement risk management strategies.

‍

This framework is vital for ensuring that AI systems adhere to ethical and security standards, reducing vulnerabilities that could lead to adversarial attacks or unintended consequences. By applying NIST’s AI RMF, companies can better understand and mitigate risks associated with AI deployment, whether it’s a GenAI or RAG application.

ISO/IEC 23894

The ISO/IEC 23894:2023, currently under development, will provide international standards for managing AI risk and security. This framework is being designed to offer guidance for organizations on mitigating AI-related threats across various sectors. Once released, it will complement existing ISO standards on cybersecurity by focusing specifically on the AI domain.

As AI models become more complex and integrated into critical infrastructure, having internationally recognized standards like ISO/IEC 23894 will be essential for ensuring global consistency in how AI security is approached. This will help organizations operating across borders to meet compliance requirements while protecting their AI systems from vulnerabilities and adversarial threats.

ISO 42001

The upcoming ISO 42001 is set to become the international standard for AI management systems. While ISO/IEC 23894 focuses on risk management, ISO 42001 aims to establish a formalized structure for organizations to govern AI development and operations. This framework will help organizations incorporate AI safety, security, and ethical considerations into the fabric of their management processes.

Adopting ISO 42001 will likely become a critical step for companies working with AI models, particularly those deploying ML and NLP systems in sensitive applications such as healthcare, finance, or autonomous driving. It will set guidelines for securing AI-driven processes, ensuring they are resilient to adversarial attacks and system failures.

EU AI Act

The EU AI Act, released in 2024, is one of the most comprehensive pieces of AI legislation to date. The Act classifies AI applications into four risk categories: Unacceptable Risk, High Risk, Limited Risk, and Minimal Risk. Each category has different compliance requirements, with the strictest standards applied to High Risk AI systems, such as biometric identification and critical infrastructure AI.

One of the key aspects of the EU AI Act is its focus on transparency and accountability in AI systems. This legislation mandates that companies ensure their AI models are secure and trustworthy, with robust mechanisms in place to prevent exploitation. This is especially relevant in preventing adversarial attacks that could compromise AI systems in real-world scenarios.

OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications

The OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model (LLM) Applications, released in 2023, is a crucial resource for securing LLMs, such as GPT-4, which power GenAI applications. The OWASP guidelines focus on common vulnerabilities in LLM applications, such as prompt injection, jailbreaking, and data leakage.

‍

• Prompt Injection: Attackers manipulate LLM outputs by crafting malicious prompts.
• Jailbreaking: Hackers bypass restrictions on LLMs, allowing them to perform unintended or dangerous tasks.
• Data Leakage: LLMs inadvertently expose sensitive information learned during training.

‍

The OWASP guidelines help developers secure LLMs against these vulnerabilities, ensuring that the models behave as intended and don’t inadvertently expose sensitive information or perform unsafe actions.

Google’s Secure AI Framework (SAIF)

Google's Secure AI Framework (SAIF) is another key player in the AI security landscape. SAIF is a comprehensive set of security controls and best practices designed specifically for AI models and applications. It addresses critical areas like data privacy, model integrity, and system reliability.

By integrating SAIF into their AI development pipeline, companies can enhance their ability to defend against adversarial attacks and other threats to AI systems. SAIF is particularly effective when combined with tools such as AI-specific firewalls, which monitor and control traffic to AI models, and vulnerability scanners that detect weaknesses in AI systems.

Importance of AI Security Tools

AI security cannot rely solely on frameworks and standards; it requires practical, hands-on tools to defend against active threats. Three key tools are essential in securing AI systems:

Firewall for AI

A firewall for AI functions similarly to traditional cybersecurity firewalls, but it's tailored for AI models. It monitors interactions with AI models, restricting access to unauthorized prompts, queries, or input data that could be used for adversarial attacks. Firewalls prevent dangerous prompts from being fed into an LLM or image classifier, ensuring the system remains safe.

Vulnerability Scanners for AI

AI vulnerability scanners are tools designed to detect weaknesses within AI models. They can assess whether an AI model is vulnerable to attacks like adversarial inputs or model inversion attacks. For example, in image recognition models, scanners can detect if the model is prone to being fooled by subtle changes in input data, like confusing a stop sign with a green light.

Red Teaming AI

Red teaming involves simulating attacks on AI models to identify vulnerabilities before attackers exploit them. This practice is crucial for organizations that rely heavily on ML, NLP, or GenAI applications. By actively probing their AI systems for weaknesses, companies can strengthen their defenses and make their models more robust.

Conclusion

As AI continues to transform industries, the need for securing these systems has become more urgent than ever. With adversarial attacks targeting LLMs, image recognition models, and other AI-driven applications, organizations must take proactive measures to protect their AI infrastructure. Security frameworks like NIST’s AI RMF, the EU AI Act, and ISO standards, coupled with tools like AI firewalls, vulnerability scanners, and red-teaming exercises, are essential for safeguarding AI from new and evolving threats.

AI is not only the future of technology; it’s also the new attack surface. It is imperative for organizations to adopt these frameworks and security measures to ensure their AI systems are resilient, trustworthy, and secure against potential adversarial attacks.

‍